If you’re specifying filtration or safety screens for EU-bound equipment, you’ve likely typed ce certification 250 micron stainless steel mesh into a search box at least once. Same here. I’ve spent enough time in Anping, Hebei—the wire-mesh capital—to see what’s marketing fluff and what actually clears EU conformity checks.

Three themes keep coming up: traceable 316/316L chemistry, documentation that plugs straight into CE technical files, and reproducible micronic accuracy. Many customers say they want “CE-certified mesh,” but, to be honest, CE marking applies to the finished machinery or construction product. The mesh supports compliance when it’s made to recognized standards and shipped with proper declarations and test data.
Origin: East Industry, Anping City, Hebei, China. The 316 Stainless Steel Wire Mesh Panel is a welded-panel format; for fine cut-points like 250 μm, suppliers (including this one) typically laminate or frame a woven 316 cloth (per ASTM E2016/ISO 9044) onto a 316 welded support. Types available also include galvanizing options (hot-dipped or electro) for carbon-steel counterparts—useful in non-corrosive enclosures.
| Spec | 316 Stainless Steel Wire Mesh Panel (≈250 μm) |
|---|---|
| Material | AISI 316 / 316L (EN 1.4401/1.4404), welded frame + woven cloth |
| Aperture (nominal) | ≈250 μm (real-world use may vary ±5–10% depending on wire dia) |
| Typical mesh count | Around 60 mesh (wire dia ≈0.17–0.20 mm) |
| Finish options | Pickled & passivated; galvanized variants for non-SS builds if needed |
| Standards | ASTM E2016, ISO 9044; material cert per EN 10204 3.1 |
| Service life | 3–10 years in typical food/pharma/chemical duty; environment-dependent |

For ce certification 250 micron stainless steel mesh used in CE-marked machinery or process equipment, buyers request: DoC referencing applicable directives (e.g., Machinery Directive for the machine), RoHS/REACH statements, material traceability, and test logs. Typical data snippets: salt spray per ASTM B117 > 500 h (no red rust on 316), bubble-point/flow tests for permeability, and dimensional checks vs ISO 9044 tolerances.
Food and beverage filtration, pharma granulation screens, solvent recovery, water pre-filtration, dust-collector guards, and electronics coolant strainers. One German OEM told me their CE review went faster once the mesh supplier provided ISO 9044 mapping and 3.1 certs—no drama.

| Vendor | Docs & Standards | Lead Time | Customization |
|---|---|---|---|
| East Industry (Anping) | EN 10204 3.1, ISO 9044, ASTM E2016; RoHS/REACH | ≈10–20 days | Panels, rolls, framed screens, custom edges |
| EU Distributor | Strong CE file support, premium price | Stock for common sizes | Moderate—mostly standard SKUs |
| Generic Trader | Varies; request samples and certs | Uncertain | Unclear; check tolerances |
Bottom line: for ce certification 250 micron stainless steel mesh, prioritize standard-backed mesh, traceable metallurgy, and testable aperture data. The paperwork matters almost as much as the wire.