If you’ve worked a production line, you already know: wire mesh filters sit quietly between a smooth shift and an emergency shutdown. The Medicine Filtration Wire Mesh from East Industry (Anping City, Hebei, China) is one of those unflashy components that, to be honest, decides whether a batch passes QA.

Three shifts I’m seeing on factory floors: (1) migration from 304 to 316L for CIP/SIP reliability; (2) tighter weave control for repeatable microns; and (3) traceability—EN 10204 3.1 MTCs are now table stakes. In pharma and food, customers say they also want surface finish data, not just mesh counts.
East Industry’s spec covers AISI 321/302/304/304L/316/316L stainless, black wire, and high-temp alloys like Al5Cr23, Ni80Cr20, Ni60Cr15. Weaves include plain dutch, twilled dutch, reverse dutch, and five-heddle—each chosen for different cut-points and pressure-drop behavior. Characteristics? Acid/alkali/heat/wear resistance—no surprises, but the consistency is the story.
| Parameter | Typical options/values | Notes (≈ real-world) |
|---|---|---|
| Material | 304/304L, 316/316L, 321; Ni80Cr20, Ni60Cr15; Al5Cr23; black wire | 316L favored for pharma lines; Ni alloys for ≥800°C service |
| Weave | Plain Dutch, Twilled Dutch, Reverse Dutch, Five-heddle | Twilled Dutch ≈ finer filtration at lower ΔP than plain |
| Mesh range | ≈ 20–635 mesh | Selection depends on cut-point and viscosity |
| Filtration rating | ≈ 5–200 μm (application-based) | Final rating validated by bubble-point/flow tests |
| Operating temp | Up to ~500°C (316L); higher for Ni alloys | CIP/SIP compatible; confirm with media chemistry |
| Standards | ASTM E2016, ISO 9044 | QA audits request these on certs |

Mining slurries, oil and chemical units, food lines, pharmaceutical filtration, machine-making, labs, even aviation hydraulics. In pharma, wire mesh filters often serve as prefilters upstream of membranes—catching gels, fibers, and undissolved bits so the expensive elements last longer.
A syrup line (pH 6–7, 45–85°C CIP) swapped a legacy 304 plain-dutch screen for 316L twilled-dutch ≈ 10–15 μm. Result: average differential pressure dropped ~18% at the same flow, and cleaning intervals extended from daily to every 2–3 days. QC noted fewer visible specks; operators, fewer alarms. Not dramatic, but it pays back in a month—sometimes less.
| Vendor | Lead time | Customization | Certs/Docs | Indicative cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Industry (Anping) | ≈ 7–20 days | Weave, alloy, cut size, pleat packs | ISO 9001, ASTM/ISO conformance, EN 10204 3.1 | $$ (balanced) |
| Regional fabricator | ≈ 3–10 days | Good; limited in exotic alloys | Basic test reports | $$$ |
| Trading company | ≈ 15–35 days | Varies; check traceability | Varies by mill | $–$$ |
It seems that the big differentiators are weave accuracy (ISO 9044), documented pore-size testing (ASTM F316), and cleanability. Many customers say they’ll pay a little more for stable ΔP curves.

Final thought: wire mesh filters don’t need to be the hero—just predictable. East Industry’s Medicine Filtration Wire Mesh keeps showing up with the right paperwork and repeatable weaves. Honestly, that’s what production wants.